Truss et al v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
| Nita Truss, Jennifer Truss Seburn and Johnathan Truss |
| Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada |
| 1:2019cv01213 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| Claude M Hilton |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, filed by Johnathan Truss, Jennifer Truss Seburn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Greenberg, Jeremy) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Johnathan Truss, Nita Truss, Jennifer Truss Seburn. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada waiver sent on 9/20/2019, answer due 11/19/2019. (Greenberg, Jeremy) |
| Filing 2 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Mark David DeBofsky and Certification of Local Counsel Jeremy Greenberg Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6851059. by Jennifer Truss Seburn, Johnathan Truss, Nita Truss. (Greenberg, Jeremy) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Claude M. Hilton and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (klau, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6846078.), filed by Johnathan Truss, Nita Truss, Jennifer Truss Seburn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Greenberg, Jeremy) Modified text on 9/20/2019 (klau, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
