Silver v. Capital One Financial Corporation
| Frederick Omoyuma Silver |
| Capital One Financial Corporation |
| 1:2019cv01361 |
| October 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| T S Ellis |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDERED that plaintiff's second amended complaint #6 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 12/9/2019. (dvanm, c/m 12/9/2019)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Capital One Financial Corporation, filed by Frederick Omoyuma Silver. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dvanm, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDERED that plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint revising his allegations in accordance with this Order. Plaintiff must file any amended complaint consistent with Order by December 6, 2019 at 5:00 p.m., failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 11/06/19. (tran, c/m on 11/06/19)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Capital One Financial Corporation, filed by Frederick Omoyuma Silver. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dvanm, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed informa pauperis #2 is GRANTED.It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's causes of action under the FDCPA, under the Texas Financial Code, for invasion of privacy, and for unreasonable collection efforts are DISMISED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint revising his allegations in accordance with this Order. Plaintiff must file any amended complaint by November 27, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. All facts, allegations, and causes of action that plaintiff wishes to pursue and on which plaintiff intends to rely, must be contained within a single operative pleading - the new amended complaint. It is further ORDERED that plaintiffs causes of action based on 18 U.S.C. 1341 and 1342 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff must not include claims based on these criminal statutes in his amended complaint. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 10/29/2019. (dvanm, c/m 10/29/2019)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Frederick Omoyuma Silver. (dvanm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Capital One Financial Corporation, filed by Frederick Omoyuma Silver. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(dvanm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Silver v. Capital One Financial Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Frederick Omoyuma Silver | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Capital One Financial Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
