Witzel et al v. Arevalo
| Mary Witzel, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC and Hyung Gyu Sun |
| Rene Arevalo, Jr. |
| 1:2019cv01437 |
| November 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Rossie D Alston |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mary Witzel, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Hyung Gyu Sun Rene Arevalo, Jr served on 11/29/2019, answer due 12/20/2019 (Ludwig, David) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Rene Arevalo, Jr. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachment for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(pmil, ) |
| Filing 3 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC. (Ludwig, David) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Hyung Gyu Sun, Mary Witzel. (Ludwig, David) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6933161.), filed by Mary Witzel, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, Hyung Gyu Sun. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ludwig, David) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. (pmil, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
