Mohammadi v. Barr, et al.
Torpekai Mohammadi |
Jedidah Hussey, Ken Cuccinelli, Kevin McAleenan, William Barr and Sarah Taylor |
1:2019cv01470 |
November 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
T S Ellis |
Michael S Nachmanoff |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to William Barr, Ken Cuccinelli, Jedidah Hussey, Kevin McAleenan, Sarah Taylor, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons issued, #2 Notice to Attorney)(aott) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons McAleenan by Torpekai Mohammadi. (Anwari, Deeba) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6948674.), filed by TORPEKAI MOHAMMADI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT, #2 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Summons)(Anwari, Deeba) |
Notice of Correction re: #1 Complaint. The filing user has been notified to file a corrected proposed summons to defendant Kevin McAleenan by using the event "Proposed Summons". (pmil, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. (pmil, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.