Greenbridge Construction, Inc. v. Aegis Security Insurance Company et al
Greenbridge Construction, Inc. |
Desbulid EG Management Services JV, LLC, Aegis Security Insurance Company and Hudson Insurance Company |
1:2019cv01585 |
December 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Michael S Nachmanoff |
Anthony J Trenga |
Miller Act |
40 U.S.C. § 3131 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Upon review of the pleadings and the record, the court makes the following rulings: The Revised Rule 26(f) report filed by the parties is approved unless modified by the court herein or hereafter. See order for more details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff on 2/11/2020. (rban, ) |
Filing 14 REVISED Discovery Plan by Greenbridge Construction, Inc..(Webster, Lucas) |
Filing 13 Consent Discovery Plan by Greenbridge Construction, Inc..(Webster, Lucas) |
Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 2/12/2020 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 400 before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/18/2020 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 701 before District Judge Anthony J. Trenga. Discovery due by 6/12/2020. Signed by District Judge Anthony J. Trenga on 1/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent, #2 Pretrial Notice)(dzir) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Lee-Ann Christine Brown on behalf of Desbulid EG Management Services JV, LLC (Brown, Lee-Ann) |
Filing 10 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Hudson Insurance Company. (Mervis, Jeffrey) |
Filing 9 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Aegis Security Insurance Company. (Mervis, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Aegis Security Insurance Company, Hudson Insurance Company.(Mervis, Jeffrey) |
Filing 7 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Desbulid EG Management Services JV, LLC. (Patin, Douglas) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Desbulid EG Management Services JV, LLC.(Patin, Douglas) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Greenbridge Construction, Inc. Hudson Insurance Company served on 12/23/2019, answer due 1/13/2020 (Webster, Lucas) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Greenbridge Construction, Inc. Aegis Security Insurance Company served on 12/23/2019, answer due 1/13/2020 (Webster, Lucas) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Greenbridge Construction, Inc.. (Webster, Lucas) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Aegis Security Insurance Company, Desbulid EG Management Services JV, LLC, Hudson Insurance Company. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(acha, ) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6990565.), filed by Greenbridge Construction, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons - Aegis, #5 Summons - Desbuild, #6 Summons - Hudson, #7 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Webster, Lucas) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Anthony J Trenga and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. (acha, ) |
Notice of Correction re #1 Complaint. The filing user has been notified to file the Corporate Disclosure Statement as separate event. (acha, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.