Towers Watson & Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company Pittsburgh, PA et al
| 1:2020cv00810 |
| October 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Alexandria Office |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
236
Filed in error and removed (swil).
|
|
Filing
184
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and it is hereby DECLARED that there is coverage under the Policies for the Settlements reached in the Underlying Actions; denying as moot 42 Defendant s' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Ripeness; denying 36 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, or Stay the Complaint, for Failure to Abide by the Policies' Mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause; ORDERED that within 14 days of the days of this Order, the parties, jointly if possible, otherwise separately, file a notice advising the Court concerning what issues, if any, remain to be decided before the entry of a final order. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 10/05/2021. (choy, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Towers Watson & Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company Pittsburgh, PA et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
