Lacey v. Lasaka et al
| Michael Eugene Lacey |
| WTKR Channel 3 News CBS and Mrs. Kofo Lasaka |
| 1:2020cv01029 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Liam O'Grady |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT entered in favor of the defendants, Mrs. Kofo Lasaka and WTKR Channel 3 News CBS and against the plaintiff, Michael Eugene Lacey. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 9/15/2020. (c/m 9/15/2020 shea) |
Filing 4
ORDER dismissing with prejudice this civil action ; directing that this dismissal may affect plaintiff's ability to proceed in forma pauperis in future civil actions; directing that the Clerk record this dismissal for purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act; denying #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; directing the Clerk to enter judgment and to close this civil action. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 9/15/2020. (see order for details)(c/m 9/15/2020 shea)
|
| Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (c/m 9/3/2020 shea) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Eugene Lacey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(shea, ) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Kofo Lasaka, WTKR Channel 3 News CBS, filed by Michael Eugene Lacey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Prisoner Database)(shea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
