Reyes v. Associated Building Maintenance Co., Inc.
Blanca Reyes |
Associated Building Maintenance Co., Inc. |
1:2020cv01045 |
September 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
T S Ellis |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDERED that the Consent Motion is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that all deadlines in this case are stayed for thirty (30) days in order to allow the parties sufficient time to finalize their settlement. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 10/23/2020. (tran) |
Filing 10 Consent MOTION to Stay by Associated Building Maintenance Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Barnsback, Michael) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Associated Building Maintenance Co., Inc. answer due 10/23/2020.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 10/14/2020. (dvanm, ) |
Filing 8 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement by Associated Building Maintenance Co., Inc. (Barnsback, Michael) Modified to correct text on 10/14/2020 (dvanm, ). |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Associated Building Maintenance Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Barnsback, Michael) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Associated Building Maintenance Co., Inc.. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(dvanm, ) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons re #4 Amended Complaint by Blanca Reyes. (Sutter, Matthew) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Blanca Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Sutter, Matthew) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Associated Building Maintenance Co., Inc.. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(aott, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Blanca Reyes. (Sutter, Matthew) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7387080.), filed by Blanca Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sutter, Matthew) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan. (aott, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Reyes v. Associated Building Maintenance Co., Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Associated Building Maintenance Co., Inc. | |
Represented By: | Michael Earl Barnsback |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Blanca Reyes | |
Represented By: | Matthew Thomas Sutter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.