Smith v. Jones et al
| Tony Smith |
| D. Lewis and Crystal Jones |
| 1:2020cv01157 |
| October 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| T S Ellis |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Letter to the Court in re Status (copy of docket sheet mailed to Plaintiff). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jlan)
|
|
Filing 8
Supplemental re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tony Smith. (aott, )
|
|
Filing 7
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Crystal Jones, D. Lewis, filed by Tony Smith. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 proposed summons, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Envelope)(aott, )
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Amend Complaint by Tony Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope)(jlan)
|
|
Filing 5
Letter to the Court/Judge Ellis from Tony Smith. (pmil, )
|
|
Filing 4
Acknowledgment of Receipt. (pmil, )
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tony Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(pmil, )
|
|
Filing 2
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Tony Smith. (pmil, )
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner COMPLAINT against Crystal Jones, D. Lewis filed by Tony Smith. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Data Report, #2 Envelope, #3 Attachments, #4 Proposed Summons)(pmil, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
