De Lonte v. DeJoy et al
Trazell De Lonte |
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf and Louis DeJoy |
1:2020cv01239 |
October 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
Anthony J Trenga |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 11/12/2020. (jlan) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Trazell De Lonte. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jlan) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Pro Se E-Noticing. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 11/05/2020. (ahas) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by Trazell De Lonte. (ahas) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Louis DeJoy, Chad F. Wolf, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (shea) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 10/21/2020. (c/m 10/21/2020 shea) |
Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt (c/s to plaintiff). (jlan) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Trazell De Lonte. (jlan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Louis DeJoy, Chad F. Wolf filed by Trazell De Lonte. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(jlan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.