Courtney v. Clarke
| Tavoris M. Courtney |
| Harold Clarke |
| 1:2020cv01279 |
| October 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Craig Winston Stallard on behalf of Harold Clarke (Stallard, Craig) |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF Receipt as to #8 Order of Prisoner Service (2254),, filed by Harold Clarke. (Stallard, Craig) |
Filing 8
ORDERED that the petition be and is FILED; and it is furtherORDERED that petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis [Dkt. No. 2] be and is GRANTED and the petition is deemed filed as of December 11, 2020; and it is further ORDERED that petitioner's failure to leave twenty percent (20%) of his monthly deposits in his inmate account in accordance with the Consent to Collection of Fees from Inmate Trust Account form ("Consent Form") constitutes cause for dismissal of this civil action. (c/s pursuant to order). Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 12/11/2020. (ahas, )
|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (shea) |
| Filing 6 Consent to Collection of Fees by Tavoris M. Courtney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ahas) |
| Filing 5 Docketed in error and removed |
|
Filing 4
ORDERED that the Clerk request that plaintiffs institution of confinement complete the attached Inmate Account Report Form regarding plaintiffs inmate account within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff sign and return the enclosed Consent Form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that petitioner's failure to comply with any part of this Order within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, or failure to notify this Court immediately in the event he is transferred, released, or otherwise relocated, may result in the dismissal of this complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l(b). Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 11/10/2020. (c/s pursuant to order)(jlan)
|
| Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (c/m 10/30/2020) (ahas) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tavoris M. Courtney. (ahas) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Tavoris M. Courtney. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Database, #2 Envelope)(ahas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Courtney v. Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Harold Clarke | |
| Represented By: | Craig Winston Stallard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Tavoris M. Courtney | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
