Nicholson v. UNIFY Financial Credit Union
| Winfred F. Nicholson |
| UNIFY Financial Credit Union |
| 1:2020cv01333 |
| November 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Rossie D Alston |
| Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Memorandum in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Strike filed by UNIFY Financial Credit Union. (Reilly, Craig)
|
|
Filing 14
Request for Hearing by UNIFY Financial Credit Union re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. (Reilly, Craig)
|
|
Filing 13
Memorandum in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. filed by UNIFY Financial Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Reilly, Craig)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. by UNIFY Financial Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reilly, Craig)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Strike Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE by Winfred F. Nicholson. (dvanm, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Pro hac vice as to Brett Ryan. Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 12/14/2020. (dvanm, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. UNIFY Financial Credit Union answer due 12/31/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 12/11/2020. (dvanm, )
|
|
Filing 8
Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by UNIFY Financial Credit Union. (Reilly, Craig)
|
|
Filing 7
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Brett Ryan and Certification of Local Counsel Craig C. Reilly Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-7539811. by UNIFY Financial Credit Union. (Reilly, Craig)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by UNIFY Financial Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reilly, Craig)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Winfred F. Nicholson UNIFY Financial Credit Union served on 11/20/2020, answer due 12/11/2020 (dvanm, )
|
|
Filing 4
Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 14683087314 (ahas)
|
|
Filing 3
Acknowledgment of Receipt. (dvanm, c/m 11/9/2020)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to UNIFY Financial Credit Union. Mailed to plaintiff to be served by SPS. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(dvanm, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against UNIFY Financial Credit Union (Filing fee $400 receipt to follow), filed by Winfred F. Nicholson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dvanm, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nicholson v. UNIFY Financial Credit Union | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Winfred F. Nicholson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNIFY Financial Credit Union | |
| Represented By: | Craig Crandall Reilly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
