Ventura v. Dunavant et al
| Blanca Ventura |
| Harris Teeter, LLC, David Dunavant and Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01356 |
| November 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Based on the parties representations in their discovery plan, the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Pretrial Conference scheduled for December 23, 2020 shall be canceled. Upon review of the pleadings and the record, the court makes the following rulings:1. The Rule 26(f) report Dkt. No. #9 filed by the parties is approved unless modified by the court herein or hereafter.2. Rule 26(a) disclosures, depositions, interrogatories, requests for documents and admissions, and answers thereto shall not be filed except on order of the court, or for use in a motion or at trial.3. No general objection may be asserted in response to any discovery demand except to preserve the attorney-client privilege and work product protection.4. To the extent any party intends to assert a claim of privilege or protection as to trial preparation material, any such claim must be made in a timely manner and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5) (See Order for Details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff on 12/18/2020. (lcre, )
|
| Filing 9 Joint Discovery Plan by David Dunavant, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC.(Hoffman, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 JOINT Discovery Plan by David Dunavant, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC.(Hoffman, Joshua) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 12/23/2020 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 400 before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. Discovery due by 4/9/2021. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/15/2021 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 12/3/20. (Attachments: #1 Mag.Consent, #2 Pretrial Notice)(yguy)
|
| Filing 6 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by David Dunavant, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC. (Hoffman, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 Grounds of Defense and ANSWER to Complaint by David Dunavant, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC.(Hoffman, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Matthew Hoffman on behalf of David Dunavant, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC (Hoffman, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued for service by SPS as to David Dunavant, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(klau, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons for all 3 Defendants by Blanca Ventura. (Kelly, John) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with Jury Demand against David Dunavant, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc., Harris Teeter, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7491446.), filed by Blanca Ventura. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kelly, John) Modified text on 11/12/2020 (klau, ). |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. (klau, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
