Murphy v. MSC Industrial Supply Co
Audrey M Murphy |
MSC Industrial Supply Co and SID Tool Co., Inc doing business as MSC Industrial Supply Co. |
1:2020cv01388 |
November 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
John F Anderson |
T S Ellis |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to SID Tool Co., Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(shea) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Audrey M Murphy. (Rubin, Annette) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint (corrected) by Audrey M Murphy. (Rubin, Annette) |
Notice of Correction re #3 Proposed Summons; An incomplete, illegible, or incorrect document was filed. The filing user has been notified to refile the document. (shea) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (shea) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Audrey M Murphy. (Rubin, Annette) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Complaint by Audrey M Murphy. (Rubin, Annette) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7496529.), filed by Audrey M Murphy.(Rubin, Annette) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.