Lizama v. Toms King Virginia, LLC
Wendy Esperanza Benitez Lizama |
Toms King Virginia, LLC |
1:2020cv01540 |
December 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
John F Anderson |
Anthony J Trenga |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Upon consideration of the representations made by the parties in their Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Discovery Plan ("Joint Discovery Plan") (Docket no. 7), and taking note of the Scheduling Order entered in this case (Docket no. 5), the court makes the following rulings: The Joint Discovery Plan filed by the parties is approved in part and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 01/26/2021. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (wgar, ) |
Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Toms King Virginia, LLC. (Gatling, Yvette) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Toms King Virginia, LLC. (Gatling, Yvette) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 2/10/2021 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/17/2021 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 701 before District Judge Anthony J. Trenga. Discovery due by 6/11/2021. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 1/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent, #2 Pretrial Notice)(dzir) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint And Affirmative and Other Defenses by Toms King Virginia, LLC.(Gatling, Yvette) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued for service by SPS as to Toms King Virginia, LLC. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(klau, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Wendy Esperenza Benitez Lizama. (Render, Hailey) Modified text on 12/16/2020 (klau, ). |
Filing 1 Complaint with Jury Demand against Toms King Virginia, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0422-7546033.), filed by Wendy Esperenza Benitez Lizama. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Render, Hailey) Modified text on 12/16/2020 (klau, ). |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Anthony J Trenga and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (klau, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lizama v. Toms King Virginia, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Toms King Virginia, LLC | |
Represented By: | Yvette Vanessa Gatling |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Wendy Esperanza Benitez Lizama | |
Represented By: | Hailey Breanne Render |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.