Jones v. Andrews
Gamal Jones |
J. Andrews |
1:2021cv00024 |
January 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Claude M Hilton |
Michael S Nachmanoff |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 PLRA Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 34683049421 (lcre, ) |
Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (lcre, )(c/s) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Gamal Jones. (lcre, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Gamal Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Prisoner Data Report)(lcre, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Andrews | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: J. Andrews | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Gamal Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.