Leslie v. Saul
| Adisa K. Leslie |
| Commisioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 1:2021cv00047 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Anthony J Trenga |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 427 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adisa K. Leslie All Defendants (Bynum, Kenneth) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Pro hac vice. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 1/15/21. (pmil, )
|
| Filing 3 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Peter T. Enslein and Certification of Local Counsel Kenneth D. Bynum Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-7584889. by Adisa K. Leslie. (Bynum, Kenneth) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachment for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(pmil, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Anthony J Trenga and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. (pmil, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0422-7583311.), filed by Adisa K. Leslie. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Bynum, Kenneth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
