Gatt v. SN Servicing Corporation et al
Krista E Gatt |
Lenox Title Trustee Services, LLC, US Bank Trust, N.A., SN Servicing Corporation, McMichael Taylor Gray, LLC and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. |
1:2021cv00103 |
January 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
Claude M Hilton |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to File. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until Monday, April 26, 2021 to respond to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 3/19/21. (c/m on 3/19/21) (klau, ) |
Filing 16 MOTION/Stipulated Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Request to Waiver Hearing by Krista E Gatt. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(klau, ) |
Filing 15 Waiver of re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. (request to waive return date and oral argument) by Lenox Title Trustee Services, LLC, McMichael Taylor Gray, LLC, SN Servicing Corporation, US Bank Trust, N.A. (Yacko, Keith) |
Notice of Correction re #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. The filing user has been notified to file a Notice of Hearing Date or a Notice of Waiver of Oral Argument.(klau, ) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. by Lenox Title Trustee Services, LLC, McMichael Taylor Gray, LLC, SN Servicing Corporation, US Bank Trust, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Roseboro notice)(Yacko, Keith) |
Filing 13 Waiver of re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) with Roseboro,. (request to waive return date and oral argument) by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (Nader, John) |
Notice of Correction re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) with Roseboro,. The filing user has been notified to file a Notice of Hearing Date or a Notice of Waiver of Oral Argument.(klau, ) |
Filing 12 Memorandum in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) with Roseboro,. filed by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Note, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - DOT, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Nader, John) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) with Roseboro,. by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Roseboro notice)(Nader, John) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by US Bank Trust, N.A.. (Yacko, Keith) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SN Servicing Corporation. (Yacko, Keith) |
Notice of Correction re #5 Notice of Hearing Date. Incorrect docket event used. (clar, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 2/4/21. (klau, ) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lenox Title Trustee Services, LLC. (Yacko, Keith) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by McMichael Taylor Gray, LLC. (Yacko, Keith) |
Filing 5 Waiver of Hearing or schedule return date, and notice of plaintiff's consent to the relief requested in Defendants' motion re #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint or to file Motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 in response to Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - email from plaintiff consenting to relief in motion)(Nader, John) Modified text on 2/5/2021 (clar, ). |
Notice of Correction re #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint or to file Motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 in response to Complaint, The filing user has been notified to file a Notice of Hearing Date or a Notice of Waiver of Oral Argument. (klau, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint or to file Motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 in response to Complaint by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Nader, John) |
Filing 3 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (Nader, John) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Claude M. Hilton and Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan. (dvanm, ) |
Filing 2 EXHIBIT Corrected Exhibit "O" (Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal) to Notice of Removal by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc... (Nader, John) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal with consent of all defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0422-7603737.), filed by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Ex. A - Compl. (part 1), #3 Exhibit Ex. A - Compl (part 2), #4 Exhibit Ex. B - Summons to SPS, #5 Exhibit Ex. C - SPS SCC records, #6 Exhibit Ex. D - Compl. to SN, #7 Exhibit Ex. E - SN SCC records, #8 Exhibit Ex. F - Compl. to MTG, #9 Exhibit Ex. G - Compl. to Lenox, #10 Exhibit Ex. H - Lenox SCC records, #11 Exhibit Ex. I - Summons and Compl. to US Bank, #12 Exhibit Ex. J - Consent, #13 Exhibit Ex. K - US Bank Art. of Assoc., #14 Exhibit Ex. L - Assign. of DOT, #15 Exhibit Ex. M - Prop. Assess., #16 Exhibit Ex. N - Note, #17 Exhibit Ex. O - Notice of filing of notice of removal)(Nader, John) Modified on 2/1/2021 (NO ANSWER FILED) (klau, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.