Hill v. McNulty et al
David E. Hill |
Paul J. McNulty, Jane Doe, John Doe, Alexandria District Attorney's Office, Paul Timko, Karen Nester, Robert Spencer and Gerald B. Lee |
1:2021cv00112 |
January 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Claude M Hilton |
Michael S Nachmanoff |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion to Reassign #11 is DENIED; that plaintiff's Motion to Amend #13 is DENIED; that plaintiff's Motion to Order Service #14 is DENIED as MOOT; that plaintiff's Motion for Request for Production of Documents #16 is DENIED as MOOT; To appeal, plaintiff must file a written notice of appeal with the Clerk's Office within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order; A written notice of appeal is a short statement indicating a desire to appeal this Order and noting the date of the Order plaintiff wants to appeal; Failure to file a timely notice of appeal waives the right to appeal this decision; Plaintiff need not explain the grounds for appeal until so directed by the court. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 03/26/2021. (choy, )(c/s on 03/26/2021) |
Filing 18 Letter to the Court, filed by David E. Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(choy, ) (copy of the docket mailed on 03/22/2021) |
Filing 17 Proposed Summons, filed by David E. Hill. (choy, ) |
Filing 16 Motion for Request for Production of Documents, filed by David E. Hill. (choy, ) |
Filing 15 Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction to #12 Amended Complaint, filed by David E. Hill. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Preliminary Injunction)(choy, ) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Order the U.S. Marshal to Serve a Copy of the Amended Complaint on the Defendants, filed by David E. Hill. (choy, ) |
Filing 13 MOTION to File Amended Complaint, filed by David E. Hill. (choy, ) |
Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Alexandria District Attorney's Office, Jane Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe(Correctional Officer), Gerald B. Lee, Paul J. McNulty, Karen Nester, Robert Spencer, Paul Timko, filed by David E. Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(choy, ) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Reassign Case by David E. Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(choy, ) |
Filing 10 Letter to the Court, filed by David E. Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(choy, ) |
Filing 9 Letter to the Court, filed by David E. Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(choy, ) |
Filing 8 RULE 58 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk on 02/26/2021. (dvanm, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 02/26/2021. (dvanm, c/m 2/26/2021) |
Filing 6 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (choy, )(c/s on 02/01/2021) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons, filed by David E. Hill. (choy, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Request for Production of Documents, filed by David E. Hill. (choy, ) |
Filing 3 Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction to #1 Prisoner Complaint, filed by David E. Hill. (choy, ) |
Filing 2 Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction, filed by David E. Hill. (choy, ) |
Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Alexandria District Attorney's Office, Jane Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe(Correctional Officer), Paul J. McNulty, Karen Nester, Robert Spencer, Paul Timko (Filing fee $ 402 (not paid).), filed by David E. Hill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Prisoner Database)(choy, ) (6) Envelope) (choy, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.