Anderson v. Cochran et al
| Lawrence E. Anderson |
| RADM Denise M. Hinton, Rochelle P. Walensky, Janet Woodcock and Norris Whitehouse Cochran, IV |
| 1:2021cv00175 |
| February 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Claude M Hilton |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Pro Se E-Noticing. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 03/15/2021. (dvanm, )
|
|
Filing 6
Letter to the court. (dvanm, )
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued, via SPS, as to Norris Whitehouse Cochran, IV, Denise M. Hinton, Rochelle P. Walensky, Janet Woodcock, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice)(dvanm, mailed to plaintiff for service 2/22/2021)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by Lawrence E. Anderson. (dvanm, )
|
|
Filing 3
Proposed Summons by Lawrence E. Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(dvanm, )
|
|
Filing 2
Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number 14683088696. (dvanm, )
|
|
Case Reassigned to District Judge Claude M. Hilton. District Judge T. S. Ellis, III no longer assigned to the case. (dvanm, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Norris Whitehouse Cochran, IV, Denise M. Hinton, Rochelle P. Walensky, Janet Woodcock, filed by Lawrence E. Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dvanm, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
