Chambliss v. Central State Hospital
| Raheem Supreme Chambliss, Sr. |
| Central State Hospital, Trost, Magakein and Silvia |
| 1:2021cv00203 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), this dismissal may affect plaintiffs ability to proceed in forma pauperis in future civil actions; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk record this dismissal for purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. (See Order for Details) Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 4/16/2021. (c/s to plaintiff) (lber)
|
| Filing 9 Inmate Account Report Form filed. (klau, ) |
| Filing 8 Consent to Collection of Fees from Inmate Trust Account by Raheem Supreme Chambliss, Sr. (klau, ) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Raheem Supreme Chambliss, Sr. (klau, ) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Magakein, Silvia, Trost, filed by Raheem Supreme Chambliss, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(klau, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER directing that plaintiff be and is permitted to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order by filing out the 1983 complaint form; directing that if an amended complaint is not received within 30 days from the date of this Order, the court will dismiss this civil action; directing that plaintiff be and is assessed a filing fee of $350.00 and an administrative fee of $52.00; conditionally granting #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis to the extent that plaintiff need not prepay the filing fee at this time; directing that the Clerk request that plaintiff's institution of confinement complete the attached Inmate Account Report Form; directing that within 20 days of the entry of this Order, plaintiff sign and return Consent to Collection of Fees form; directing that plaintiff failure to comply with any part of this Order within 30 days from the entry of this Order, or failure to notify the Court immediately upon being transferred, released, or other wise relocated, may result in the dismissal of the complaint. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 2/24/2021. (c/m/w forms on 2/24/2021 shea)
|
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Western; Case Number 7:21-cv-00105. Original file and docket sheet received. (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/22/2021: #2 Prisoner Data Report) (ldab, ). |
|
Filing 3
Order transferring case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Signed by Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on 2/22/2021. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(slt) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 2/22/2021.]
|
| Notification of transfer of 1983 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus from the Western District of VA Case No. 7:21cv105 to the Eastern District of Virginia. (ldab, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Account Report (Incomplete) and statement of Assets by Raheem Supreme Chambliss, Sr (slt) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 2/22/2021.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Central State Hospital, filed by Raheem Supreme Chambliss, Sr.(slt) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 2/22/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
