Richards v. Lawhorne et al
| Mark E. Richards |
| John Poffenberger and Dana Lawhorne |
| 1:2021cv00360 |
| March 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued and given to US Marshal for service as to Dana Lawhorne, John Poffenberger. (klau, ) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S OFFICE ERROR - DOCUMENT REMOVED AND FILED IN CORRECT CASE - Record of Administrative Record received from defendant. (dvanm, ) (Main Document 5 replaced on 4/13/2021) (dvanm, ). Modified on 4/13/2021 (dvanm, ). |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 3/24/21. Copy mailed by chambers (klau, )
|
| Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (c/m on 3/24/21) (klau, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mark E. Richards. (klau, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/24/2021: #1 Affidavit) (klau, ). |
| Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT against Dana Lawhorne, John Poffenberger, filed by Mark E. Richards. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter)(klau, ) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/25/2021) (klau, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
