Todman v. Saul
| Barbara Leona Todman |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 1:2021cv00460 |
| April 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| T S Ellis |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Certified Mail by Barbara Leona Todman as to U.S. Attorney served on 5/3/21, answer due 7/2/21 (Gillikin, Robert) Modified text on 6/1/2021 (klau, ). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued for service by SPS as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(klau, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (klau, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons all 3 summonses by Barbara Leona Todman. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Gillikin, Robert) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Andrew M. Saul ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0422-7725503.), filed by Barbara Leona Todman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gillikin, Robert) Modified text on 4/15/2021 (klau, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
