Duarte v. Aguaviva of Alexandria, Inc. et al
| Enma Duarte |
| Miguel A Cordero and Aguaviva of Alexandria, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00507 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| Anthony J Trenga |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Aguaviva of Alexandria, Inc., Miguel A Cordero. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Lawsuit)(kgall) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint for Aguaviva of Alexandria, Inc. by Enma Duarte. (McFarland, Rachel) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint for Miguel Cordero by Enma Duarte. (McFarland, Rachel) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly Poff Salzmann on behalf of Enma Duarte (Salzmann, Kelly) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Colleen McFarland on behalf of Enma Duarte (McFarland, Rachel) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Anthony J Trenga and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (kgall) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-7751110.), filed by Enma Duarte. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sandoval-Moshenberg, Simon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
