Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant: John Doe
Case Number: 1:2021cv00547
Filed: April 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Ivan D Davis
Referring Judge: Liam O'Grady
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2021 Filing 12 Report on the determination of an action. (kgall) (C/S to copyright office)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 So Ordered in re #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 6/15/2021. (kgall)
June 14, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Sciarrino, Dawn)
June 2, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael N Lau on behalf of John Doe (Lau, Michael)
June 2, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael N Lau on behalf of John Doe (Lau, Michael)
June 2, 2021 Notice of Correction -- The filing user has been notified that document 8 Notice of Appearance is an incorrectly saved PDF fillable form and missing the proper header. The document has been removed. The filing user was directed to refile the document. (kgall)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER in re #4 Motion For Leave to Serve Third Party Subpoena Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 5/6/2021. (kgall)
May 6, 2021 Filing 6 Waiver of re #4 MOTION for Discovery for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference Oral Argument by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Sciarrino, Dawn)
May 6, 2021 Filing 5 Memorandum in Support re #4 MOTION for Discovery for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Sciarrino, Dawn)
May 6, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for Discovery for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sciarrino, Dawn)
May 3, 2021 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Liam O'Grady and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (kgall)
April 30, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC AO 121 - Report on Filing of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sciarrino, Dawn)
April 30, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Sciarrino, Dawn)
April 30, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-7763532.), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sciarrino, Dawn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Represented By: Michael N Lau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Dawn Marie Sciarrino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?