Bamba v. Garland et al
Mory Sadia Bamba |
Jean King, Chief Appellate Immi David H. Wetmore and Attorney General Merrick Garland |
1:2021cv00638 |
May 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
Anthony J Trenga |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 So Ordered re #5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Mory Sadia Bamba. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 7/15/2021. (shea) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal (Date of service corrected) by Mory Sadia Bamba (Goodman, John) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Mory Sadia Bamba (Goodman, John) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Jean King, David H. Wetmore. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(shea) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Mory Sadia Bamba. (Goodman, John) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-7805435.), filed by Mory Sadia Bamba. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, I-130 Approval Notice, #2 Exhibit 2, Filing Receipt for Motion to Reopen, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goodman, John) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Anthony J Trenga and Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan. (shea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.