Kapitus Servicing, Inc. v. Azul Tequila Grill, LLC et al
| Kapitus Servicing, Inc. |
| Azul Tequila Grill, Rafael Cermeno and Azul Tequila Grill, LLC doing business as Azul Tequila Grill |
| Azul Tequila Grill, LLC |
| 1:2021cv00640 |
| May 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Liam O'Grady |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Negotiable Instrument |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER re #13 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Rafael Cermeno, Azul Tequila Grill, LLC. ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE (see Order for further details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 2/16/2022. (swil)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION of Dismissal Rule 41 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice by Azul Tequila Grill, LLC, Rafael Cermeno. (Williamson, Andrew) |
| Re-Set Deadlines/Hearings Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/18/2022 at 01:30 PM in Alexandria Telephonically before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (Per DW) (clar, ) |
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. Magistrate Judge Michael S. (MJ)Nachmanoff no longer assigned to the case. (jlan) |
|
Filing 12
Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - This matter comes before the Court on the parties Rule 26(f) report (Dkt. No. #11 ). Based on the parties representations in their discovery plan, the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Pretrial Conference scheduled for October 6, 2021 shall be canceled. Upon review of the pleadings and the record, the court makes the following rulings:1. The Rule 26(f) report (Dkt. No. #11 ) filed by the parties is approved unless modified by the court herein or hereafter.2. Rule 26(a) disclosures, depositions, interrogatories, requests for documents and admissions, and answers thereto shall not be filed except on order of the court, or for use in a motion or at trial (See Order for Details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff on 10/5/2021. (lcre, )
|
| Initial Pretrial Conference set for 10/06/2021 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 400 before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff TERMINATED (per MSN Chambers). (lcre, ) |
| Filing 11 Joint Discovery Plan by Azul Tequila Grill, LLC, Rafael Cermeno.(Williamson, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #5 Counterclaim against Azul Tequila Grill, LLC, Rafael Cermeno, filed by Kapitus Servicing, Inc. (choy,) |
|
Filing 9
CONSENT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Counterclaim; directing that that Kapitus Servicing, Inc. is granted an extension of the deadline to Answer the Counterclaim up to and including September 14, 2021, the date the Motion was filed; directing that the Answer to Counterclaim filed by Kapitus Servicing, Inc. with the Motion shall be deemed timely filed as of September 14, 2021 and the Clerk shall docket said Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff on 09/14/2021. (choy, ) Modified docket text on 9/14/2021 (aott, ).
|
| Filing 8 Waiver of re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Counterclaim Waiver of Hearing by Kapitus Servicing, Inc. (Hennigan, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Counterclaim by Kapitus Servicing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Answer, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Hennigan, Timothy) |
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 10/6/2021 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 400 before Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/18/2022 at 01:30 PM in Alexandria Courtroom 1000 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. Discovery due by 2/11/2022. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 09/07/21. (Attachments: #1 Pretrial Notice, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(pmil, )
|
| Filing 5 Azul Tequila Grill and Rafael Cermeno's ANSWER with Jury Demand to Complaint from Kapitus Servicing, Inc., Azul Tequila Grill's and Rafael Cermeno'sfor breach of contract and UCL violations COUNTERCLAIM Azul Tequila Grill's and Rafael Cermeno'sfor breach of contract and UCL violations against Kapitus Servicing, Inc. by Rafael Cermeno, Azul Tequila Grill, LLC.(Williamson, Andrew) Modified text on 6/24/2021 (klau, ). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Join Motion for Extension of Time to File. ORDERED, that Defendants shall have until up to and including June 23, 2021 to respond to the Complaint. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 6/2/21. (klau, )
|
| Filing 3 Waiver of re #2 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint Notice of Waiver of Hearing by Azul Tequila Grill, LLC, Rafael Cermeno (Williamson, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Azul Tequila Grill, LLC, Rafael Cermeno. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Williamson, Andrew) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Liam O'Grady and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. (klau, ) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Circuit Court of the County of Arlington Case no, CL 21-594 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-7806395.), filed by Azul Tequila Grill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. B Notice of Service and Summons, #3 Exhibit Ex. C Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Williamson, Andrew) Modified text on 5/25/2021 (No Answer Filed) (klau, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
