Jones v. Nowlin et al
Ra'Quan Jones |
Austin Nowlin and William Martz, III |
1:2021cv00837 |
July 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Rossie D Alston |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDERED that the complaint be and is conditionally filed pending compliance with the requirements of this Order. ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order, plaintiff sign and return the attached consent form. ORDERED that plaintiff particularize and amend his complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order using the enclosed standardized 1983 complaint form. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 9/1/2021. (kgall) (C/S of Order, Consent Form, and 1983 form to plaintiff; C/S of Order and Inmate Account Report Form to institution) |
Filing 5 Letter and notice from Ra'quan Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kgall) |
Filing 4 Letter from Ra'Quan Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kgall) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ra'Quan Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kgall) |
Filing 2 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (kgall) (C/S to plaintiff) |
Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ra'Quan Jones. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Data Sheet, #2 Envelope)(kgall) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.