Yang v. Edward et al
| Zhemei Yang |
| Su-Ling Hsueh, Janette Edward, Yanmei Liu, Sophia Mineyev and Sophia Natalia |
| 1:2021cv01026 |
| September 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
| Liam O'Grady |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed in error and removed (jlan) |
Filing 4
ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel as the court does not appoint counsel in civil actions without a special circumstance. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 9/14/2021. (see Order for further details). (nneb) (c/s to Plaintiff, Pro se)
|
| Notice of Correction mailed to plaintiff, Zhemei Yang, Pro se re #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. The filing user has been notified to file a Notice of Hearing Date or a Notice of Waiver of Oral Argument. (nneb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Zhemei Yang. (nneb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Zhemei Yang. (nneb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Janette Edward, Su-Ling Hsueh, Yanmei Liu (Filing fee $ 402. Not Paid), filed by Zhemei Yang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(nneb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
