Marcus et al v. Dennis et al
Gregory H Marcus and Jaime N Marcus |
Marlene Dennis and Marlene Dennis Design, LLC |
1:2021cv01085 |
September 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Rossie D Alston |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Per RDA chambers motions set for 12/3/2021 on the pleadings (clar, ) |
Filing 14 Memorandum in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Gregory H Marcus, Jaime N Marcus. (Clinton, Timothy) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas Ryan Johnson on behalf of Marlene Dennis, Marlene Dennis Design, LLC (Johnson, Nicholas) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Marlene Dennis Design, LLC. (Deitch, David) |
Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan. Magistrate Judge Michael S. (MJ)Nachmanoff no longer assigned to the case. (jlan) |
Set Deadlines as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Motion Hearing set for 12/3/2021 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 601 before District Judge Rossie D. Alston Jr. (clar, ) |
Filing 11 Notice of Hearing Date set for December 1, 2021 re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Deitch, David) |
Filing 10 Memorandum in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Marlene Dennis, Marlene Dennis Design, LLC. (Deitch, David) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Marlene Dennis, Marlene Dennis Design, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Deitch, David) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Marlene Dennis answer due 11/5/2021; Marlene Dennis Design, LLC answer due 11/5/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff on 10/21/2021. (dvanm) |
Filing 7 Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint or Other Responsive Pleading by Marlene Dennis, Marlene Dennis Design, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Deitch, David) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jaime N Marcus, Gregory H Marcus Marlene Dennis Design, LLC served on 10/5/2021, answer due 10/26/2021 (Clinton, Timothy) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jaime N Marcus, Gregory H Marcus Marlene Dennis served on 10/5/2021, answer due 10/26/2021 (Clinton, Timothy) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Marlene Dennis, Marlene Dennis Design, LLC, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(dvanm, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. (dvanm, ) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons to Marlene Dennis Design, LLC by Gregory H Marcus, Jaime N Marcus. (Clinton, Timothy) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons to Marlene Dennis by Gregory H Marcus, Jaime N Marcus. (Clinton, Timothy) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8016144.), filed by Jaime N Marcus, Gregory H Marcus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Contract, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Clinton, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.