E-Z Ink, Inc. et al v. Brother Industries, Ltd.
| E-Z Ink, Inc., Imagetech Direct Inc., Lemero, Plenty Talent Corp. and Zhuhaiaikedamaoyiyouxiangongsi (Akda) |
| Brother Industries, Ltd. |
| 1:2021cv01109 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Intradistrict Transfer to Norolk Division. See 2:21cv564. (afar) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by E-Z Ink, Inc., Imagetech Direct Inc., Lemero, Plenty Talent Corp., Zhuhaiaikedamaoyiyouxiangongsi (Akda). (Colantoni, Krystyna) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by E-Z Ink, Inc., Imagetech Direct Inc., Lemero, Plenty Talent Corp., Zhuhaiaikedamaoyiyouxiangongsi (Akda) re #1 Complaint, Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent (Colantoni, Krystyna) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by E-Z Ink, Inc., Imagetech Direct Inc., Lemero, Plenty Talent Corp., Zhuhaiaikedamaoyiyouxiangongsi (Akda). (Colantoni, Krystyna) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8030655.), filed by Zhuhaiaikedamaoyiyouxiangongsi (Akda), Plenty Talent Corp., E-Z Ink, Inc., Lemero, Imagetech Direct Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Colantoni, Krystyna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
