Yagi v. Hilgartner
1:2021cv01123 |
June 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Alexandria Office |
Bankruptcy Withdrawl |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 (c)(1) Findings, Concl. & Proposed Judgment |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER re the judgment of the Bankruptcy Court as to the dischargeability of Creditor/Appellee's Personal Injury Proof of Claim is AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the Bankruptcy Court 039;s Report and Recommendation and its Supplemental Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED in part and AMENDED in part; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the case is REMANDED to the Bankruptcy Court Adversary Proceeding in Case No. 20-1049-BFK for purpo ses of revising the allowable non-dischargeable interest amount in accordance with this Court's opinion; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the stay in 1:19-cv-01305 before this Court remains in place pending the resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings upon written notice of the parties. Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 06/30/2022. (dvanm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Yagi v. Hilgartner | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.