Rowland v. TPine Leasing Capital Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Steven John Rowland
Defendant: TPine Leasing Capital Corporation, Jegatheeswaran Balasupramaniyam and Skyline Transport, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv01180
Filed: October 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Ivan D Davis
Referring Judge: Claude M Hilton
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury/ Motor Vehicle
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 So Ordered re #11 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Jegatheeswaran Balasupramaniyam, Skyline Transport, Inc., TPine Leasing Capital Corporation. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 8/4/2022. (swil)
August 2, 2022 Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Jegatheeswaran Balasupramaniyam, Skyline Transport, Inc., TPine Leasing Capital Corporation. (Moore, Peter)
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Consent Motion to Continue Pretrial Conference. ORDERED, that as the parties have represented a stipulated dismissal is forthcoming, they are instructed to contact the Court in the event the Pretrial Conference requires rescheduling. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 7/20/2022. (swil)
July 20, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeremy Calvin Huang on behalf of Jegatheeswaran Balasupramaniyam, Skyline Transport, Inc., TPine Leasing Capital Corporation (Huang, Jeremy)
July 19, 2022 Filing 8 Consent MOTION to Continue Pretrial Conference by Jegatheeswaran Balasupramaniyam, Skyline Transport, Inc., TPine Leasing Capital Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Moore, Peter)
March 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order. Because the parties' Proposed Joint Discovery Plan #6 adequately addresses the matters that would be discussed during the initial pretrial conference and counsel consent to waiving their appearances at the initial pretrial conference, the initial pretrial conference scheduled for March 23, 2022, pursuant to Rule 16(b) and this Court's March 1, 2022, Order, is cancelled. Upon consideration of the representations made by the parties in their Proposed Joint Discovery Plan, the Court makes the following rulings: The parties' Joint Discovery Plan is approved and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the Court. See order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 3/16/2022.(c/s) (lgue, ) Modified on 3/16/2022 (lgue, ).
March 16, 2022 Filing 6 Joint Discovery Plan by Jegatheeswaran Balasupramaniyam, Skyline Transport, Inc., TPine Leasing Capital Corporation.(Moore, Peter)
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 3/23/2022 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 301 before Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/21/2022 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 800 before District Judge Claude M. Hilton. Discovery due by 7/15/2022. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 3/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Pretrial Notice, #2 Magistrate Consent Form)(kgall)
October 28, 2021 Filing 4 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Skyline Transport, Inc.. (Moore, Peter)
October 28, 2021 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Jegatheeswaran Balasupramaniyam, Skyline Transport, Inc., TPine Leasing Capital Corporation.(Moore, Peter)
October 21, 2021 Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by TPine Leasing Capital Corporation. (Moore, Peter)
October 21, 2021 Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8060544.), filed by TPine Leasing Capital Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Police Report, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Peter)
October 21, 2021 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Claude M. Hilton and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (choy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rowland v. TPine Leasing Capital Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven John Rowland
Represented By: Randall T. Trost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TPine Leasing Capital Corporation
Represented By: Peter Meredith Moore
Represented By: Jeremy Calvin Huang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jegatheeswaran Balasupramaniyam
Represented By: Peter Meredith Moore
Represented By: Jeremy Calvin Huang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Skyline Transport, Inc.
Represented By: Peter Meredith Moore
Represented By: Jeremy Calvin Huang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?