Boughaleb v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Amal Boughaleb
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 1:2021cv01202
Filed: October 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Rossie D Alston
Referring Judge: John F Anderson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SEALED ORDER granting #3 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Amal Boughaleb. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 12/07/2021. (choy, ) Modified on 12/8/2021 (dest, ).
December 1, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amal Boughaleb. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons - Regional Counsel)(Farrell, Clifford)
December 1, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amal Boughaleb. Amal Boughaleb served on 11/15/2021, answer due 1/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons - Attorney General)(Farrell, Clifford)
December 1, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amal Boughaleb. Commissioner of Social Security served on 11/12/2021, answer due 1/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons - US Attorney)(Farrell, Clifford)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED that upon consent of the parties, this civil action will be referred to Magistrate Judge Anderson for entry of final judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 11/02/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Availability of a United States Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction)(choy, )
October 29, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, Attorney General, and U.S. Attorney, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the Electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(choy, )
October 29, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Amal Boughaleb. (Farrell, Clifford)
October 29, 2021 Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Amal Boughaleb. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons - US Attorney, #2 Exhibit Summons - Regional Counsel)(Farrell, Clifford)
October 29, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint , filed by Amal Boughaleb. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Farrell, Clifford)
October 29, 2021 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (choy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boughaleb v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amal Boughaleb
Represented By: Clifford Michael Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?