Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research v. National Institutes of Health
| Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research |
| National Institutes of Health |
| 1:2021cv01275 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. ORDERED that Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before February 7, 2022. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 12/22/2021. (kgall)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by National Institutes of Health. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Loftus, Meghan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Meghan Elizabeth Loftus on behalf of National Institutes of Health (Loftus, Meghan) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to National Institutes of Health, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(dvanm, ) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research. (Schrier, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research. (Schrier, Michael) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (dvanm, ) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research. (Schrier, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research. (Schrier, Michael) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8107025.), filed by Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schrier, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research v. National Institutes of Health | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research | |
| Represented By: | Michael Jay Schrier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: National Institutes of Health | |
| Represented By: | Meghan Elizabeth Loftus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
