Hatcher v. Oloo et al
Quashawn Akeem Hatcher |
Oloo and Lewis |
1:2021cv01350 |
December 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
Patricia Tolliver Giles |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDERED that the claims for unconstitutional conditions of confinement and for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need against Deputy Oloo and Lieutenant Lewis be and are DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 2) be and is conditionally granted to the extent that plaintiff need not prepay the filing fee at this time. If the Court grants the motion, plaintiff will be required to pay the filing fee in installments after first paying an initial filing fee, and the $52.00 administrative fee will be waived (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 01/27/2022. (choy, )(C/S pursuant to the Order on 01/28/2022) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Quashawn Akeem Hatcher. (nneb) |
Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Lewis, Oloo, filed by Quashawn Akeem Hatcher. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nneb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/2/2021: #2 Prisoner Data Sheet) (nneb, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.