Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research |
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
1:2021cv01370 |
December 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Rossie D Alston |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall file its response to the Complaint on or before Friday, February 11, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 01/10/2022. (choy, ) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Levenson, Rebecca) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the Electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(choy, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr and Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan. (choy, ) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research. (Schrier, Michael) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint (to US AG) by Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research. (Schrier, Michael) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint (to US Atty, EDVA) by Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research. (Schrier, Michael) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint (to SEC) by Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research. (Schrier, Michael) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8143434.), filed by Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schrier, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Empower Oversight Whistleblowers & Research | |
Represented By: | Michael Jay Schrier |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission | |
Represented By: | Rebecca S. Levenson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.