Vasquez Castaneda v. Perry et al
| Edgardo Vasquez Castaneda |
| Superintendent Paul Perry, Lyle Boelens and Attorney General Merrick Garland |
| 1:2021cv01407 |
| December 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Patricia Tolliver Giles |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Reset Deadlines as to #8 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Motion Hearing set for 3/17/2022 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 801 before District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles. (clar, )
|
|
Filing 11
Notice of Hearing Date (Amended) re #8 MOTION for Summary Judgment , #9 Memorandum in Support, (Mezger, Matthew)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #8 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Motion Hearing set for 3/18/2022 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 801 before District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles. (clar, )
|
|
Filing 10
Notice of Hearing Date re #8 MOTION for Summary Judgment , #9 Memorandum in Support, (Mezger, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 9
Memorandum in Support re #8 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Lyle Boelens, Merrick Garland. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FREX 1, #2 Exhibit FREX 2, #3 Exhibit FREX 3, #4 Exhibit FREX 4, #5 Exhibit FREX 5)(Mezger, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Summary Judgment by Lyle Boelens, Merrick Garland. (Mezger, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew J. Mezger on behalf of Lyle Boelens, Merrick Garland (Mezger, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDERED that within 30 days the respondents show cause as to why the Petition should not be granted. Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 1/10/2022. (kgall) (C/S to US Attorney's Office)
|
|
***Motion Hearing set for 1/20/2022 terminated per Chambers. (kgall)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #4 MOTION for Order to Show Cause . Motion Hearing set for 1/20/2022 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 801 before District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles. (clar, )
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Hearing Date set for Jan. 20, 2022 re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241),, #4 MOTION for Order to Show Cause (Vidmar, Melody)
|
|
Notice of Correction in re #4 MOTION for Order to Show Cause. Counsel notified via email to file a notice or waiver of hearing. (kgall)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Edgardo Vasquez Castaneda. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, Board of Immigration Appeals Decision, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Show Cause)(Vidmar, Melody)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Service of Petition for Habeas Corpus by Melody Layne Vidmar on behalf of Edgardo Vasquez Castaneda (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, USPS Proof of Service)(Vidmar, Melody)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Melody Layne Vidmar on behalf of Edgardo Vasquez Castaneda (Vidmar, Melody)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number BVAEDC-8162178.), filed by Edgardo Vasquez Castaneda. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Supplement to Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A, Reinstated Removal Order, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B, Decision of the Immigration Judge, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C, Post Order Custody Review, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D, Letter from INTERPOL, #7 Proposed Order Proposed Order of Release, #8 Proposed Order Proposed Order of Bond Hearing)(Vidmar, Melody)
|
|
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (kgall)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
