Godoy v. Warden of FCI Pollock
| Jonathan Godoy |
| USA and Warden of FCI Pollock |
| 1:2022cv00118 |
| February 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Anthony J Trenga |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDERED that the 2241 petition [Doc. No. 1] be and is conditionally filed pending compliance with the requirements of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that petitioner particularize and amend the petition within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order by following the instructions on the attached form for filing a federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and it is further ORDERED that petitioner pay the $5.00 filing fee or complete the attached application to proceed informa pauperis (see Order for further details). Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 4/1/2022. (swil) (c/s pursuant to Order)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Madeleine Case on behalf of USA (Case, Madeleine) |
| Filing 2 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (c/m 2/7/2022 shea) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jonathan Godoy. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Prisoner Database, #3 Envelope)(shea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
