Milan v. Hamilton
| Isabel Milan |
| Bianca Hamilton and Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) |
| 1:2022cv00158 |
| February 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 GEICO'S ANSWER to Complaint by Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO).(Saunders, Tina) |
| Filing 14 Rule 26 Disclosure by Isabel Milan. (Lastrapes, Matthew) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Mr. Dix and the Dix Law Firm, PLLC are relieved of all further obligations in this matter, and the Clerk shall note on the docket the termination of their representation of Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 3/14/2022. (shea, )
|
| Filing 12 Memorandum in Support re #11 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Isabel Milan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dix, Mark) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Isabel Milan. (Dix, Mark) |
|
Filing 10
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Upon consideration of the representations made by the parties in their Joint Discovery Plan (Docket no. 9), and taking note of the Scheduling Order entered in this case (Docket no. 4), the court makes the following rulings: The Joint Discovery Plan filed by the parties is approved and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 03/08/2022. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS.(wgar, )
|
| Filing 9 Discovery Plan by Isabel Milan.(Lastrapes, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Watson Lastrapes on behalf of Isabel Milan (Lastrapes, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Watson Lastrapes on behalf of Isabel Milan (Lastrapes, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Geico Choice Insurance Company, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(shea) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons to Geico Choice Insurance Company by Isabel Milan. (Carroll, Seth) |
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 3/16/2022 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. Discovery due by 7/15/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/21/2022 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 2/23/22. (Attachments: #1 Mag.Consent, #2 Pretrial Notice)(yguy)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Seth R Carroll on behalf of Isabel Milan (Carroll, Seth) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Bianca Hamilton.(Keeney, Carter) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (shea) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8242939.), filed by Isabel Milan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dix, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
