Flores v. Romero et al
Plaintiff: Angie Flores
Defendant: Danilo E. Diaz Romero and S&G Installation Services, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00211
Filed: February 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Ivan D Davis
Referring Judge: Michael S Nachmanoff
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury/ Motor Vehicle
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2022 Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal in Consideration of Settlement by Angie Flores. (Van Pelt, Elizabeth)
March 22, 2022 Filing 9 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by S&G Installation Services, Inc.. (Worst, Robert)
March 22, 2022 Filing 8 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint by Danilo E. Diaz Romero, S&G Installation Services, Inc..(Worst, Robert)
March 18, 2022 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Danilo E. Diaz Romero on March 16, 2022, filed by Angie Flores. (Van Pelt, Elizabeth)
March 9, 2022 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint for S&G Installation Services, Inc. served on Said Hadjbarat on 03/04/2022, filed by Angie Flores. (Van Pelt, Elizabeth)
February 28, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Danilo E. Diaz Romero, S&G Installation Services, Inc., NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(shea)
February 28, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Gobind Singh Sethi on behalf of Angie Flores (Sethi, Gobind)
February 28, 2022 Filing 3 Proposed Summons as to Defendant S&G Installation by Angie Flores. (Van Pelt, Elizabeth)
February 28, 2022 Filing 2 Proposed Summons as to Defendant Romero by Angie Flores. (Van Pelt, Elizabeth)
February 28, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8266103.), filed by Angie Flores. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Van Pelt, Elizabeth)
February 28, 2022 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (shea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores v. Romero et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angie Flores
Represented By: Gobind Singh Sethi
Represented By: Elizabeth Lauren Van Pelt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danilo E. Diaz Romero
Represented By: Robert Edward Worst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S&G Installation Services, Inc.
Represented By: Robert Edward Worst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?