Walsh v. Fazbhu, Inc. et al
Walsh J. Martin and Martin J. Walsh |
Fazbhu, Inc. Fazbhu, Inc. doing business as 7-Eleven-Georgetown Pike doing business as 7-Eleven-Davenport Drive doing business as 7-Eleven-Edds Lane doing business as 7-Eleven-Old Dominion and Fazle Bhuiyan |
1:2022cv00262 |
March 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
John F Anderson |
T S Ellis |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Martin J. Walsh. Fazbhu, Inc. waiver sent on 3/14/2022, answer due 5/13/2022. (Lewis, Ryma) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Martin J. Walsh. Fazle Bhuiyan waiver sent on 3/14/2022, answer due 5/13/2022. (Lewis, Ryma) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Edwin Montague Ferguson, Jr for Martin J. Walsh. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 3-17-2022. (clar, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (nneb) |
Filing 2 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Edwin M. Ferguson, Jr. and Certification of Local Counsel Ryma Lewis by Walsh J. Martin. (Lewis, Ryma) |
Filing 1 Complaint , filed by Walsh J. Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Schedule A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet and Attachment)(Lewis, Ryma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.