Doores v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated d/b/a Quest Diagnsotics
Plaintiff: Aaron D. Doores
Defendant: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated d/b/a Quest Diagnsotics and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated d/b/a Quest Diagnostics
Case Number: 1:2022cv00290
Filed: March 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: John F Anderson
Referring Judge: Patricia Tolliver Giles
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 So Ordered re #6 Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice filed by Quest Diagnostics Incorporated d/b/a Quest Diagnostics. Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 5/12/2022. (swil) (c/s to pro se plaintiff)
May 3, 2022 Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Joint) by Quest Diagnostics Incorporated d/b/a Quest Diagnostics. (Glasser, Nathaniel)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed Frank C. Morris, Jr for Quest Diagnostics Incorporated d/b/a Quest Diagnostics. Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 4/01/2022. (clar, )
March 31, 2022 Filing 4 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Frank Charles Morris, Jr. and Certification of Local Counsel Nathaniel M. Glasser Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-8320725. by Quest Diagnostics Incorporated d/b/a Quest Diagnostics. (Glasser, Nathaniel)
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall have until April 14, 2022 to file a responsive pleading. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 03/24/2022. (wgar, )
March 23, 2022 Filing 2 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Respond to Complaint by Quest Diagnostics Incorporated d/b/a Quest Diagnostics. (Glasser, Nathaniel)
March 17, 2022 Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8298735.), filed by Quest Diagnostics Incorporated d/b/a Quest Diagnsotics. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Fairfax County Circuit Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons and Notice of Service of Process, #3 Exhibit 3 - Case Information from Fairfax County Circuit Court Case (Electronic Docket), #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Glasser, Nathaniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doores v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated d/b/a Quest Diagnsotics
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron D. Doores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated d/b/a Quest Diagnsotics
Represented By: Nathaniel M Glasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated d/b/a Quest Diagnostics
Represented By: Frank C. Morris, Jr.
Represented By: Nathaniel M Glasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?