Hoosen v. Mayorkas et al
Plaintiff: Marilyn Shereen Hoosen
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Case Number: 1:2022cv00324
Filed: March 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: John F Anderson
Referring Judge: T S Ellis
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 So Ordered re #6 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice filed by Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 4/22/2022. (lber)
April 22, 2022 Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. (Spavins, Elizabeth)
April 22, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Anne Spavins on behalf of Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas (Spavins, Elizabeth)
April 8, 2022 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Exhibits served on US Attorney EDVA on 04/02/2022, filed by Marilyn Shereen Hoosen. (Attachments: #1 Receipt Confirmation of Delivery)(Miller, Stevan)
March 24, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the Electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Suit)(lber)
March 24, 2022 Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus by Marilyn Shereen Hoosen. (Miller, Stevan)
March 24, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 402.), filed by Marilyn S HOOSEN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Combined Exhibits)(Miller, Stevan)
March 24, 2022 Electronic Fee Payment - as to #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus by Marilyn S HOOSEN. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8308658.. (Miller, Stevan)
March 24, 2022 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (lber)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hoosen v. Mayorkas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marilyn Shereen Hoosen
Represented By: Stevan Alexander Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Elizabeth Anne Spavins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Represented By: Elizabeth Anne Spavins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?