Sadeghi v. SOS Security of Virginia, LLC
| Sam Abolhassan Sadeghi |
| SOS Security of Virginia, LLC |
| 1:2022cv00365 |
| March 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order. Because the parties' Proposed Joint Discovery Plan #6 adequately addresses the matters that would be discussed during the initial pretrial conference and counsel consent to waiving their appearances at the initial pretrial conference, the initial pretrial conference scheduled for April 27, 2022, pursuant to Rule 16(b) and this Court's April 6, 2022, Order, is cancelled. Upon consideration of the representations made by the parties in their Proposed Joint Discovery Plan, the Court makes the following rulings: The parties' Joint Discovery Plan is approved and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the Court. See order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 4/25/2022. (lgue, )
|
| Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by SOS Security of Virginia, LLC. (Glajch, Jessica) |
| Filing 5 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by SOS Security of Virginia, LLC. (Glajch, Jessica) |
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING ORDER:Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/27/2022 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 301 before Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. Discovery due by 8/12/2022. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/18/2022 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 4/6/22. (Attachments: #1 Mag.Consent, #2 Pretrial Notice)(yguy)
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by SOS Security of Virginia, LLC.(Glajch, Jessica) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (jlan) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by SOS Security of Virginia, LLC. (Glajch, Jessica) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8323140.), filed by SOS Security of Virginia, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Glajch, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sadeghi v. SOS Security of Virginia, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sam Abolhassan Sadeghi | |
| Represented By: | Waleed Risheq |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SOS Security of Virginia, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jessica Ashley Glajch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
