Carpenter v. Clarke
Stephen Ray Carpenter |
Harold W Clarke |
1:2022cv00605 |
May 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
William E Fitzpatrick |
Anthony J Trenga |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Roseboro Notice by Harold W Clarke (Baldassari, Ken) |
Filing 10 Brief in Support to #8 Response to Habeas Petition, #9 MOTION to Dismiss and Rule 5 Answer with Roseboro,. filed by Harold W Clarke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(Baldassari, Ken) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss and Rule 5 Answer with Roseboro,. by Harold W Clarke. (Baldassari, Ken) |
Filing 8 Rule 5 Answer RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Stephen Ray Carpenter.(Baldassari, Ken) |
Filing 7 State Court Record Received from Supreme Court of Virginia (1 thumb drive forwarded to staff attorney office) (dvanm) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ken Baldassari on behalf of Harold W Clarke (Baldassari, Ken) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF Receipt as to #4 Order of Prisoner Service (2254), filed by Harold W Clarke. (Baldassari, Ken) |
Filing 4 ORDERED that the petition [Dkt. No. 1] be and is FILED; and it is further ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, respondent show cause why the writ should not be granted. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 05/31/2022. (see order for details)(dvanm, c/m 5/31/2022) |
Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Western; Case Number 7:22-cv-00270. Original file and docket sheet received. (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/26/2022: #2 Prisoner Data Report) (ldab, ). |
Notification of transfer of 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus from the Western District of VA Case No. 7:22cv270 to the Eastern District of Virginia. (ldab, ) |
Filing 2 Order transferring case to Eastern District of Virginia. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 5/25/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 5/26/2022.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Stephen Ray Carpenter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-3) Pages 10 through 15 of the Petition (2254 Form) were not included. (aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 5/26/2022.] |
Filing Fee Received $ 5.00, receipt number 700072035 (aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 5/26/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carpenter v. Clarke | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Stephen Ray Carpenter | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Harold W Clarke | |
Represented By: | Ken Baldassari |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.