Copeland v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
| Daniel Copeland |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, LP |
| Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Central Virginia, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00832 |
| July 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| Anthony J Trenga |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Central Virginia, Inc., NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(nneb) |
| Filing 10 Proposed Summons for Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Central Virginia by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Murdock, John) |
| Filing 9 Third Party Complaint against Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Central Virginia, Inc., filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP.(Murdock, John) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint; and it is further ORDERED that Wal-Mart Stores, East LP shall file its Third-Party Complaint as a separate docket entry and shall arrange for the prompt service on the third-party defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 9/8/2022. (nneb)
|
| Filing 7 Waiver of re #6 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint Waiver of Hearing for Consent Motion by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Murdock, John) |
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Third Party Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Murdock, John) |
|
Filing 5
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Upon consideration of the representations made in Defendant's Proposed Joint Discovery Plan ("Joint Discovery Plan") (Docket no. 4), and taking note of the Scheduling Order entered in this case (Docket no. 3), the court makes the following rulings: The Joint Discovery Plan filed by defendant is approved as modified below in Paragraph 5 and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 08/16/2022. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (wgar, )
|
| Filing 4 Discovery Plan by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP.(Murdock, John) |
|
Filing 3
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 8/17/2022 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/15/2022 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Telephonically before District Judge Anthony J. Trenga. Discovery due by 12/9/2022. Signed by District Judge Anthony J. Trenga on 7/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent, #2 Pretrial Notice)(dzir)
|
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Anthony J Trenga and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (kgall) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP.(Murdock, John) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8486186.), filed by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Action Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Murdock, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
