Strebe v. Hicks et al
| Brian David Strebe |
| D. Hicks, M. Robinson, D. Slaw, D. Hayes, S. C. Mays, Lawrenceville Correctional Center, L. Fleming, Z. Davis and Virginia Department Of Corrections |
| 1:2022cv00865 |
| July 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #4 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 09/13/2022. (dvanm, c/m 9/13/2022)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER MOTION for Reconsideration by Brian David Strebe. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(jlan) |
|
Filing 3
ORDERED that this civil rights action is DISMISSED as having been improvidently opened; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Preservation of Evidence is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 8/11/2022. (nneb)(c/s to plaintiff, pro se) Modified on 8/12/2022 (nneb, ).
|
| Filing 2 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (dvanm, c/m 8/4/22) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Z. Davis, L. Fleming, D. Hayes, D. Hicks, Lawrenceville Correctional Center, S. C. Mays, M. Robinson, D. Slaw, Virginia Department Of Corrections, filed by Brian David Strebe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Letter, #3 Certificate of Service)(dvanm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
