Schneider v. Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services
Jacob Austin Schneider |
Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services |
1:2022cv00871 |
August 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Leonie M Brinkema |
William E Fitzpatrick |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Notice of Hearing Date (October 28, 2022) re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction with Roseboro,. (Hardy, Robert) |
Filing 5 Memorandum in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction with Roseboro,. filed by Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services. (Hardy, Robert) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction with Roseboro,. by Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services. (Hardy, Robert) |
Set Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction with Roseboro. Motion Hearing set for 10/28/2022 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema. (dvanm) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services served on 8/22/2022, answer due 9/12/2022 (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(show) Modified docket text on 9/6/2022 (show). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services (Attachments: #1 Summons Notice)(swil) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 14683096149.), filed by Jacob Austin Schneider. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19, #21 Exhibit 20, #22 Exhibit 21, #23 Exhibit 22, #24 Exhibit 23, #25 Exhibit 24, #26 Exhibit 25, #27 Exhibit 26, #28 Exhibit 27, #29 Exhibit 28, #30 Exhibit 29, #31 Exhibit 30, #32 Exhibit 31, #33 Exhibit 32, #34 Exhibit 33, #35 Civil Cover Sheet, #36 Receipt)(swil) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema. (swil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Schneider v. Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jacob Austin Schneider | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fairfax County Department of Public Works and Environmental Services | |
Represented By: | Robert Mccay Hardy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.