Etemad v. Abbarin et al
Plaintiff: Kamran Etemad
Defendant: Ali Abbarin, Azita Abbarin and Ramin Abbarin
Case Number: 1:2022cv00900
Filed: August 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Leonie M Brinkema
Referring Judge: William E Fitzpatrick
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDERED that this civil action be and is STAYED until further notice from the Court; and it is further ORDERED that counsel for plaintiff advise the Court of the status of pro se defendant Ali's bankruptcy proceeding no later than December 31, 2022. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 9/19/2022. (swil) (c/s pursuant to Order)
September 19, 2022 Filing 5 SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record as to Ali Abbarin by Kamran Etemad. (Canter, Bradley)
September 1, 2022 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & Complaint served on Ali Abbarin a/k/a Ramin Abbarin on 8/29/2022, filed by Kamran Etemad. (Canter, Bradley)
September 1, 2022 Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & Complaint served on Azita Abbarin on 8/29/2022, filed by Kamran Etemad. (Canter, Bradley)
August 9, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ali Abbarin, Azita Abbarin, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Summons Notice)(swil)
August 8, 2022 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema and Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick. (swil)
August 8, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8512271.), filed by Kamran Etemad. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to Ali Abbarin, #3 Summons to Azita Abbarin, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit 3, #7 Exhibit 4)(Canter, Bradley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Etemad v. Abbarin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kamran Etemad
Represented By: Bradley Todd Canter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ali Abbarin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Azita Abbarin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ramin Abbarin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?